To:
Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:41:25 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<20030925171735.GG11061@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: draft vienna minutes (sorry about the delay)
Tim, what do you mean by "work either way"? There's no additional configuration work required for DHCPv6 - any protocol, whether it's RAs or DHCPv6 or ???, that passes the addresses of DNS servers to hosts must be configured with those addresses. If the DHCPv6 server is in a router, it can be configured along with all of the other router configuration parameters, which is how we configure the DHCPv6 server in IOS. There's no protocol development work required for DHCPv6 forwarding. RFC3315 defines how DHCPv6 messages are forwarded by DHCPv6 relay agents. - Ralph At 06:17 PM 9/25/2003 +0100, Tim Chown wrote: >[...] >There is still work either way in how the DHCPv6 (Lite) settings are >propogated to the router, or how DHCPv6 forwarding accurs where DHCPv6 >requests are sourced on a subnet with no server. > >Thoughts? > >Tim #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.