To:
dnsop@cafax.se
From:
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date:
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 01:20:15 -0800
In-reply-to:
Your message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2003 04:18:37 +1000." <20030320041837.069afd18.ggm@apnic.net>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doing reverse for IPv6.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "George" == George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net> writes:
George> Let me get this right. You are saying that inherently, because
George> its a top-down hierarchical model, various security models are
George> using it to find the KEY to perform subsequent validation on the
George> end-to-end trust.
George> So, for well behaved delegations, you assert it has real value
George> for real work.
yes!
George> And this work (HIP, HIP6) is likely to have wider adoption in
George> other WG as well (ie multihoming)
It is one possibility, there are others. multi6 is far from close to
adopting anything.
George> Is that it? Because if so, that needs much bigger prominence in
George> the DNS activity, so we don't go on assuming nobody cares about
George> this stuff. And, it is going to need to be put into other ops
George> forums, that lack of reverse management is impeding other work.
I agree.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPnmHzYqHRg3pndX9AQH6tQQA5eRmH5yCxFOS+0OJedZaCAtRXDfudKnN
uu8PeTa/2zlf608bTHvo2We3tAtdZYehlSO1KFeLWgOz2kT33Z2ACPR1Uucj6I/2
2I0Ms+RVmzysUmOIa+Kv90JU4D5XmkbFONi6KjlLy5s4PikQFFXIptVYT8kwAMpb
M4eUo+7SCXo=
=8qhz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <dnsop-request@cafax.se>.