To:
Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
cc:
ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se
From:
itojun@iijlab.net
Date:
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 10:43:22 +0900
In-reply-to:
brian's message of Fri, 19 Jan 2001 09:16:28 CST. <3A685A4C.7802A509@hursley.ibm.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns
>> >> % I think: >> % - it should be okay to deploy AAAA records to certain degree >> % - we need to be very conservative about deplying A6 records, >> % as A6 presents highly different behavior than A/AAAA records. >> % # of queries would increase, # of additoinal records would >> % go skyrocket. >I think it was recognized a long time ago that the initial deployment >of A6 records should be limited to two (or at most 3) levels. The question >is whether that is enough to avoid the horrors described by Dan Bernstein >over on IPNG. I see... it is unfortunate RFC2874 does not cover it. it has A6 reference from leaf customer A6 record to ISP A6 record, and 5 levels of indirection. itojun