To:
perry@wasabisystems.com
Cc:
randy@psg.com, seamus@bit-net.com, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
Havard Eidnes <he@runit.no>
Date:
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:20:13 +0100
In-Reply-To:
Your message of "19 Jan 2001 18:53:29 -0500"<87n1cnhzeu.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: IPv6 dns
> We further assume that no root server machines return AAAA or > A6 records for machines serving "." unless it gets queried over > v6 transport, in order to minimize the "can't fit in a > datagram" issue. You'll have to excuse my inexperience with the intimate details of BINDv9, but is this code already part of BINDv9? I don't suppose use of EDNS0 would serve as a suitable alternative distinguishing criterion for whether to add v6 glue records to replies? > > o its ip address will be cached in other servers > > ...which is okay since they're real servers with perfectly fine data... ...and no new IPv4 address would be added for the new "separate" v6-serving hosts, I suppose. Regards, - Håvard