To:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc:
Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, Havard Eidnes <he@runit.no>, seamus@bit-net.com, users@ipv6.org, dnsop@cafax.se, ngtrans@sunroof.eng.sun.com
From:
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@wasabisystems.com>
Date:
20 Jan 2001 05:06:46 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Randy Bush's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2001 20:32:55 -0800"
Sender:
owner-dnsop@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> writes: > > this has implications for the roots; but perhaps also, for their > > ISPs and for address assignment in general. regardless of what > > assumptions we make about IPv6 renumbering elsewhere, we don't > > want to renumber the root servers very often. > > and i thought y'all were talking about an *experiment*. I believe I've said about five or six times that I, at least, am not talking about an experiment. I'm talking about *deployment*. I can't speak for other people, but from my point of view, IPv6 is no longer "experimental". Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry@wasabisystems.com -- Quality NetBSD CDs, Support & Service. http://www.wasabisystems.com/