To:
David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Cc:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, Key Distribution <keydist@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:58:08 -0500
Delivery-Date:
Wed Jan 2 19:57:48 2002
In-Reply-To:
<B856550B.1FB5%david.conrad@nominum.com>
Sender:
owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Arguements on key distribution vs. DNS
I only raise the issues, I'm not about to defend them...but I feel that a clarification is necessary: At 8:46 PM -0500 12/31/01, David Conrad wrote in response to me: >> One cog in maintaining high reliability is simplicity. Simplicity means >> uncluttered software implementation and a strict bounds on the data stored >> therein. > >While I'll buy the "uncluttered software implementation" (and I might add >"too late!"), I'm not so convinced on the "data stored therein". To the >contrary, I figure the reliability of the system should be independent of >the data stored therein. If the data held within is limited, load is (probably) limited. With a lighter load, most anything is more robust than a heavy load. ... To others reading this, as is probably evident from the breadth of the original list, I can't fully support everything I posted - treat me like the messenger (as in "don't shoot the") - up until the "MY OPINION" header. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.