[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
Cc: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>, Key Distribution <keydist@cafax.se>
From: Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:58:08 -0500
Delivery-Date: Wed Jan 2 19:57:48 2002
In-Reply-To: <B856550B.1FB5%david.conrad@nominum.com>
Sender: owner-keydist@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Arguements on key distribution vs. DNS

I only raise the issues, I'm not about to defend them...but I feel that a
clarification is necessary:

At 8:46 PM -0500 12/31/01, David Conrad wrote in response to me:
>> One cog in maintaining high reliability is simplicity.  Simplicity means
>> uncluttered software implementation and a strict bounds on the data stored
>> therein.
>
>While I'll buy the "uncluttered software implementation" (and I might add
>"too late!"), I'm not so convinced on the "data stored therein".  To the
>contrary, I figure the reliability of the system should be independent of
>the data stored therein.

If the data held within is limited, load is (probably) limited.  With a
lighter load, most anything is more robust than a heavy load.

...

To others reading this, as is probably evident from the breadth of the
original list, I can't fully support everything I posted - treat me like
the messenger (as in "don't shoot the") - up until the "MY OPINION" header.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                NAI Labs
Phone: +1 443-259-2352                      Email: lewis@tislabs.com

Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.



Home | Date list | Subject list