To:
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Cc:
EPP Provreg <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Howard Eland <heland@afilias.info>
Date:
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:36:02 -0600
In-Reply-To:
<1E105B26-060A-4054-9881-F36911B2D5A0@shinkuro.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] draft-gould-rfc4310bis-05.txt Submitted for Review
If it seems more confusing, then never mind (note the "may" in my original comment). It seems we have a couple of folks on the list that didn't care for this. -Howard On Feb 23, 2010, at 7:48 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > On 2010-02-23, at 16:17, Howard Eland <heland@afilias.info> wrote: > >> Section 3.3. Maximum Signature LIfetime >> Nit: for clarity, you may want to add "in the parent zone" to the end of the sentence "The maxSigLife value applies to the RRSIG resource record (RR) over the DS RRset.". >> > > That actually seems confusing to me. The DS is only ever in the parent or an effective parent (e.g. Lookaside zone, where this could also be used). What's the benefit of adding this? > > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > <ajs@shinkuro.com> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to ietf-provreg-request@cafax.se