To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:32:45 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<44AE66CA.7090905@knipp.de>
Mail-Followup-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>,ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Reply-To:
Andrew Sullivan <andrew@ca.afilias.info>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.5.9i
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] EPP Implementation Test Matrix
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:51:06PM +0200, Klaus Malorny wrote:
> Ah, come on. The registry is not responsible for the errors that are done
> by the registrar.
You've not been on the end of a complaint call about this, I take it?
Because I can tell you right now that, irrespective of who does what,
there are at least some people who regard any unexpected happenings
as the fault of the registry, irrespective of who issued what
commands. (This is not to paint everyone with the same brush, note:
there are pleny of people who do look at their own error messages.
But of course, those people tend to test their clients completely,
too, so that they don't accidentally send the same command multiple
times.)
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@ca.afilias.info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x4110