To:
Patrick Mevzek <provreg@contact.dotandco.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:28:34 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<20060619163142.GI6677@home.patoche.org>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] Implementation Report Update
At 6:31 PM +0200 6/19/06, Patrick Mevzek wrote: > >> 2. Offline review of domain, host, and contact transform operations. In >> truth, one registrar has reported that they have successfully tested >> this feature with domains and hosts, but I want to confirm that before >> reporting success. > >Partially (until I understand better) implemented in my software. >The latest version implements parsing of panData result. >It was not clear from my reading of the RFC how things should >operate in other cases. > >I'm in contact with a ccTLD registry starting to use EPP as well as >one .COM registrar, to enhance supports for multiple operations. > >If anyone wants to hit me with a clue bat about this feature, I would be >happy to code what is necessary in next version. Actually one of the points of the exercise is to show that you can implement the standard by reading it. Can you describe what about the offline review text was confusing, so we see if that language needs clarification for other readers? If it doesn't change what actually happens, we can make those updates while moving the documents to draft standard. thanks, Ted Hardie