To:
"Andrew Sullivan" <andrew@ca.afilias.info>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:57:51 -0400
Content-class:
urn:content-classes:message
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Thread-Index:
AcWfdDe0hNXagacGTaC25wZyrhCYkQAA06gw
Thread-Topic:
[ietf-provreg] Country codes (another EPP Document Update)
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] Country codes (another EPP Document Update)
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se > [mailto:owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se] On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 3:16 PM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Subject: [ietf-provreg] Country codes (another EPP Document Update) > > I just remembered that there's one more annoyance that I've forgotten > to mention, but I think we'd benefit from addressing. > > RFC 3733 requires (in section 2.4.3) that registrant country be > represented by the ISO 3166 country code. > > The problem is, as I'm sure everyone is aware, that the ISO 3166 > rules permit not only the obsolescence of a country code, but its > reassignment. The possibility that a country code will come to refer > to some other country seems to be conceptually broken for our > purposes, because while countries go out of existence (and their > country code is deleted), the addresses often don't change (and even > if they did, there's be precious little way of getting the data from > the contact if one interacts with the person corresponding to the > contact object indirectly). Formally speaking, this means that > allowing (for instance) YU in an address is not permitted today, even > though it was correct when the address was created. This is of > course a pain, because the country code is valid at one date, and > becomes invalid later. > > I know that people elsewhere in the IETF are struggling with this > problem for considerably more important cases than this one; but is > there anything we can do about it now, while we're looking at these > documents? If you know of a way to describe a country with an identifier that never changes, clue me in. Even their commonly spoken names can change. Witness Congo->Zaire->Congo, Russia->USSR->Russia, etc. I agree with Ed. This is a back-end database "archival" issue. -Scott-