To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
janusz sienkiewicz <janusz@libertyrms.info>
Date:
Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:24:20 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] RE: draft-hollenbeck-epp-rgp-01.txt comments/proposal
Scott, thanks for directing all participants of the RGP thread (not excluding myself) to this document. I somehow missed release of this important document. I was looking for some extension guidelines mostly in "Extensible Provisioning Protocol" (section 2.7) and obviously I could not find anything satisfactory. Following the guidelines is the best way to extend the protocol functionality without loosing reasonable level of interoperability. Janusz Sienkiewicz "Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: > At this point I think it would be worthwhile for the people who are > discussing this topic to re-read section 3 of the WG's "Guidelines for > Extending the Extensible Provisioning Protocol" document. That document has > completed WG and IETF last call and is thus supposed to represent our best > thinking on the topic. > > Folks advocating protocol-level or object-level extension should then > explain how the answer to the first question in section 3 is an unequivocal > "no". > > -Scott-