To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
jaap@sidn.nl
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2003 11:57:40 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] okay, now for the next item(s)
> Three is the remaining WG draft: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-provreg-epp-ext-01.txt > > In the next few days-weeks I anticipate a last call on this document, > probably at least overlapping with the RIPE meeting next week. (Jaap > and I will be there, we can collect comments in person.) When we > pass this up, it will go as Informational. Ed, there's one thing that I'd like to add to the draft: a flow chart or some other form of decision tree to help the reader determine the right place to define an extension. I was involved in a conversation with some people last week that made it clear to me that additional guidance is needed in this area. Would it be OK to get this in before a WG last call, or would you prefer to deal with this as a last-call comment? -Scott-