To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: "'Edward Lewis'" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
From: Edward Lewis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 08:40:23 +0200
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] okay, now for the next item(s)
A WG last call is an informal event - it's not defined in 2026 (the IETF process document). A last call in a WG is a more substantial nudge to get folks to read the document... ...that being said, can you add this to the document real soon now? Jaap and I are at the RIPE meeting and talked about the document. We plan to issue a last call now so we can maybe get some folks to give us input here. Either way we'd like to start the unofficial semi-formal last call by tomorrow, preferably with the extra diagram & text. ;) PS - There is a presentation in the RIPE DNR WG on the state of EPP/provreg. I'll be reviewing the IESG response mail. At 11:57 -0400 5/12/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >Would it be OK to get this in before a WG last call, or would you prefer to >deal with this as a last-call comment? > >-Scott- -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer Your office is *not* a reality-based sit-com TV show.