To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc:
"'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, jaap@sidn.nl
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Tue, 13 May 2003 08:40:23 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF10E77B@vsvapostal8.vasrv.verisign.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: [ietf-provreg] okay, now for the next item(s)
A WG last call is an informal event - it's not defined in 2026 (the IETF process document). A last call in a WG is a more substantial nudge to get folks to read the document... ...that being said, can you add this to the document real soon now? Jaap and I are at the RIPE meeting and talked about the document. We plan to issue a last call now so we can maybe get some folks to give us input here. Either way we'd like to start the unofficial semi-formal last call by tomorrow, preferably with the extra diagram & text. ;) PS - There is a presentation in the RIPE DNR WG on the state of EPP/provreg. I'll be reviewing the IESG response mail. At 11:57 -0400 5/12/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >Would it be OK to get this in before a WG last call, or would you prefer to >deal with this as a last-call comment? > >-Scott- -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer Your office is *not* a reality-based sit-com TV show.