[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Cc: "'Edward Lewis'" <edlewis@arin.net>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se, jaap@sidn.nl
From: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 08:40:23 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF10E77B@vsvapostal8.vasrv.verisign.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] okay, now for the next item(s)

A WG last call is an informal event - it's not defined in 2026 (the 
IETF process document).  A last call in a WG is a more substantial 
nudge to get folks to read the document...

...that being said, can you add this to the document real soon now? 
Jaap and I are at the RIPE meeting and talked about the document.  We 
plan to issue a last call now so we can maybe get some folks to give 
us input here.

Either way we'd like to start the unofficial semi-formal last call by 
tomorrow, preferably with the extra diagram & text. ;)

PS - There is a presentation in the RIPE DNR WG on the state of 
EPP/provreg.  I'll be reviewing the IESG response mail.

At 11:57 -0400 5/12/03, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
>Would it be OK to get this in before a WG last call, or would you prefer to
>deal with this as a last-call comment?
>
>-Scott-

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                            +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

Your office is *not* a reality-based sit-com TV show.

Home | Date list | Subject list