To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:27:13 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<200304172037.h3HKbZZj008182@nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: [ietf-provreg] legal entity vs individual person
At 16:37 -0400 4/17/03, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:
>You need to ask for consensus on the following:
>
>please check one box, within the scope of a client-side <dnp> oerator,
>
> [] there is no such thing as "personal data" semantics
> [] there is such a thing as "personal data"semantics
>
>That is what is the present issue, get consensus on it, and there is
>nothing left in it to consider.
I'm pretty darned certain that that has been done too.
Look at the follow ups to:
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00058.html
This was two days ago, and you participated in this.
These are voices against making a distinction/or leaving this to policy.
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00065.html
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00063.html
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00068.html
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00070.html
Your last message:
http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2003-04/msg00069.html
makes it sound like you agree too:
"I can see some operators putting 'business privacy' on
the same level as 'human privacy', and some not."
Are we to "there is nothing left in it to consider" yet, or am I mistaken?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer
"I'm sorry, sir, your flight is delayed for maintenance. We are
pounding out the dents from the last landing."