[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: paf@cisco.com, Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, randy@psg.com
Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se, shollenbeck@verisign.com
From: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 08:08:29 -0800
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: [ietf-provreg] provreg's privacy issue

In response to the IESG comment:

     why do domain/contact/.. not have granular information about privacy?

The provreg WG has apparently reached consensus upon this suggestion:

     That being the case, my preference would be to put _all_ of the DNP
     syntax and semantics into an extension (where the problem can be
     addressed as a whole) while making the existing DCP element mandatory
     if that resolves the privacy issue with the IESG.

For the WG, Scott Hollenbeck will make the necessary changes to the 
base specification to reflect this consensus.  (Scott: please do this 
as soon as you get the chance.[0])  It would help the IESG to see the 
formalized text based on this.

Returning to the IESG review of these documents sometime around 
October, we feel that we have addressed all of the comments now.  As 
soon as the new documents hit the repository, we ask that the IESG 
resume its review of the specifications.

[0] Yeah, I realize that drafts submissions are being held up until 
after the IETF meeting week.
Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer

Home | Date list | Subject list