To:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
CC:
Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'"<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, iesg@ietf.org
From:
"Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>
Date:
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 09:10:36 +0000
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Subject:
Re: privacy
Well said Randy....... IMHO the spec should contain the basic parameters then each registry can extend to accomodate the applicable policy (_laws_of_the_jurisdiction) ..... which probably means that Registars, if they want to trade in the jurisdiciton will have to adjust their interfaces (C2Rr and Rr2Ry) accordingly. The effect will be that gTLD Registries (as ccTLD registries have to do already) must respect national operating conditions if they want customers from that nation.... but such is politics not technology Best Paul Randy Bush wrote: >>would you please discuss your rationale in the light that all >>gTLD registrations will also be published in the whois negating >>any utility of your requirement. > > > one - they won't be, as some registrants register from legal > juristictions which have stronger privacy requirements. please > listen to what paf is trying to tell you. > > two - i know this will come as a shock, but there are registries > other than gtlds > > three - there are more concerned parties here than registries. > again, listen to paf > > randy > >