To:
Michael Graff <Michael_Graff@isc.org>, Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Fri, 6 Dec 2002 18:16:47 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<s9s7kemg9ea.fsf@farside.isc.org>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: lastVerified: optional vs. extension
At 20:49 +0000 12/6/02, Michael Graff wrote: >I hate to keep bringing up old topics, but I don't see how ROIDs can be >left in the draft as they are now, when something that is trivial to define >(last verified date) is an extension, but ROIDs are required and at least >two implementors have stood up and said they're problems. That's not an old topic - it's a current one... BTW - if there are folks unhappy with the declaration of consensus about last-verified, speak up. I've heard murmurs... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer