RE: lastVerified: optional vs. extension

[Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>]

Let's go with the working assumption that last-verified will be 
defined as an extension.  (I.e., consensus says...)

The plan here is:

1) An individual ID is worked on towards this end.
2) Although the mailing list is a fine place to talk about this, no 
ID on this topic is to be admitted until we get the base protocol to 
Proposed Standard.
3) We won't consider any milestones about this until we *consider* 
admitting the work.

...I say this to keep us focused on getting the current set of 
documents to Proposed Standard, not to delay 'last-verified.'

At 8:02 -0800 12/6/02, Hong Liu wrote:
>I concur with Scott's observation. I would say that
>extension seems to be the way to go for lastVerified.


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
ARIN Research Engineer