To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org>
Date:
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:12:45 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
format of contents of <domain:curExpDate>
[the list got dropped from the recipient list, for some reason. possibly the recent onset of the Canadian winter has slowed my synapses :)] Begin forwarded message: > From: Joe Abley <jabley@isc.org> > Date: Thu Dec 5, 2002 13:16:21 Canada/Eastern > To: Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net> > Cc: jaap@sidn.nl, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> > Subject: Re: format of contents of <domain:curExpDate> > > > On Thursday, Dec 5, 2002, at 10:06 Canada/Eastern, Edward Lewis wrote: > >> In either case, I'd certainly encourage Joe to re-raise this as an >> implementation consideration after we hit Proposed Standard. This >> isn't an issue that is dead in the water, but it is one that is not >> sufficient to make us rethink the current drafts. > > I will make sure it is on our list. > > As I mentioned, though, my primary concern when I raised the issue > before was that it introduced a real operational problem. The > operational problem I described turned out not to exist, after more > thorough reading of the spec. > > If the decision is made to apply the suggested change after PS, it > would probably need to be lumped in with other, more substantial > changes; otherwise the version bump in the domain object schema would > impose an amount of work on server implementators which was much > larger than the (largely cosmetic) benefit of the revision. > > > Joe >