To:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Cc:
Olivier Guillard / AFNIC <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>, Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>, James M Woods <jwoods@netstormit.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Olivier Guillard <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>
Date:
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:58:12 +0100
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<3DD50EAE.7010208@knipp.de>; from Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de on Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:11:42PM +0100
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: last-verified-date
> By the way: Following the discussions here in this list, I sometimes get the > impression that the argument "this is a registry policy and therefore should not > be part of EPP" and its complement are just used as needed to exclude/include > certain parts from/into the specs. DNS as every bottlenecks is a point of meetings for many different interest and make many poeple nervous :) Anyway, we must admit that we need law and legislations sometimes, particulary when it is question of maintaining common ressources. > The A/AAAA/A6 record of the name server in the > innermost zone is the only authoritative source of the IP address of a name > server. -> agree, this is normally not the registry business to announce it Olivier le vendredi 15 novembre à 16 H 11 , Klaus Malorny a écrit : > Olivier Guillard / AFNIC wrote: > > Hello Klaus, > > > > > >>Just for clarity: The registry does not manage the in-zone name servers > >>authoritatively neither. > > > > > > it depend which registry, the world is not only a question of EPP. > > > > In principle, as clients can be anyware in the world if you want a protocol > > which is usable under national legislations (like the german one for example:) > > you want to be sure that EPP servers are configurable so that those *political* > > and surely not *technical* matters can be dealt appropriatly by any registry. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Olivier > > Hi Olivier, > > I meant this purely technically. The A/AAAA/A6 record of the name server in the > innermost zone is the only authoritative source of the IP address of a name > server. Therefore, the linkage of the name server to its superordinated domain > is a bad design, as they do not necessarily need to be defined in the same zone > (due to the feature of subdelegation) and therefore may be in different > administration "spheres" (to use another term than "domain"). > > > regards, > > Klaus > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > | | > | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH > ------- Technologiepark > Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9 > Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny 44227 Dortmund > Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de Tel. +49 231 9703 0 > > -- Olivier Guillard --- || AFNIC - Immeuble International || 2 rue Stephenson - Montigny-le-Bretonneux || 78181, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines CEDEX, France || http://www.nic.fr/ || mailto:Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr || tel: +33 1 39 30 83 31