RE: email datatype definition in Contact -05

["Liu, Hong" <Hong.Liu@neustar.biz>]

Yes, you are right. I was referring to contact, not domain in this email. I
guess I was thinking of the second email while I was writing the first, -:)

-----Original Message-----
From: Hollenbeck, Scott [mailto:shollenbeck@verisign.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:54 AM
To: 'Liu, Hong'; 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'
Subject: RE: email datatype definition in Contact -05


> I have a question for clarification on the contact-1.0.xsd 
> regarding email
> datatype:
> 
> In "createType" for the <domain:create> command, email is 
> defined as of type
> "eppcom:minTokenType"

There is no email element in the schema for <domain:create>, but there is
one in <contact:create>.  I assume that's what you're referring to.

> In both "chgType" for the <domain:update> command and 
> "infDataType" for the
> <domain:info> response, email is defined as of type "token".

Yes, they should be consistently defined as eppcom:minTokenType, though
again these elements exist in the contact schema, not the domain schema.

-Scott-