RE: BEEP Document Comments (was RE: July milestones)

["Zhang, Ning" <Ning.Zhang@neustar.biz>]

Scott,

Thanks for the comments. 

>> Well, we do have some current comments on the document...but Rick's 
>> question is still germane, what community is forming around a BEEP 
>> transport for EPP?

> There are also some old comments that haven't been completely addressed:
>
> http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2001-09/msg00010.html
> 
> Specifically, the TCP transport clarification and "Content-Type: text/xml"
> comments.  Also, the IESG is getting picky about splitting references into
> normative and informative subsections, so that should be done in the
> document.

We are aware of this. It just did not get changed in the last draft.

> New comment/thought: would it be wise to consider Marshall's transient
> profile identifier ideas, described here:?
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mrose-beep-transientid-02.txt

I think that it would be good idea to following this practice. 

Thanks,
-Ning