To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:37:00 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
BEEP Transport
I've just taken a cursory glance at beep-00, and I have a few questions/comments: BEEP does not have an explicit dependency on TCP, though this draft describes TCP connectivity. Would it be possible to clarify either a specific requirement for TCP transport (expanding on the reference to RFC3081), or note that protocols other than TCP are possible and that this is just one possible way of moving data around? I believe it completely inappropriate for a WG draft to define a profile using vendor-specific URIs. I'm not aware of any IETF document that describes IETF-standard BEEP profile definition procedures; does such a document exist? Perhaps one is needed if not, but in the mean time I think it would be better to expand on the xml.resource.org precedent used by other profiles described in IETF WG documents (such as those defined for TLS and SASL). Rather than using Content-Type: text/xml, the base EPP spec defines an application/epp+xml media type. I'd like to recommend use of this media type instead of text/xml. The XML Schema references are outdated. The current references should point here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/, and http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ <Scott/>