To:
Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Edward Lewis <edlewis@arin.net>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:59:31 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<3CFE8776.1050906@tucows.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Yokohama?
At 5:49 PM -0400 6/5/02, Daniel Manley wrote: >So what's the scoop? Are we anticipating having a meeting in >Yokohama? What's >the timing on the feedback from the IESG? Is it >worth meeting for the recent >draft releases? My mind is changeable, but looks like there won't be a meeting scheduled. The state is that 6 documents are in front of the IESG. There's no predicting when any of them will move, as 5 of them are waiting for referenced documents to advance. We do have two refreshed documents and a volunteer for a third (which I need to dig up). The two new documents haven't generated any discussion on the list. Without at least some activity on the list, there's no reason to have a meeting - because the list is what defines the WG, not the meeting. So, unless there are some threads soon, there isn't justification to reserve a time slot. And the agenda closes in about 2 weeks, if I'm not mistaken. I won't mind putting in for a time slot - the sense of the list to date is that it isn't worth it. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis +1-703-227-9854 ARIN Research Engineer