Re: Yokohama?

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Ed,

I totally agree that there is no need for a meeting in Yokohama. I'll
attempt to read the recent documents over the next.

-rick

On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Edward Lewis wrote:

> At 5:49 PM -0400 6/5/02, Daniel Manley wrote:
> >So what's the scoop?  Are we anticipating having a meeting in
> >Yokohama? What's >the timing on the feedback from the IESG?  Is it
> >worth meeting for the recent >draft releases?
>
> My mind is changeable, but looks like there won't be a meeting
> scheduled.  The state is that 6 documents are in front of the IESG.
> There's no predicting when any of them will move, as 5 of them are
> waiting for referenced documents to advance.  We do have two
> refreshed documents and a volunteer for a third (which I need to dig
> up).
>
> The two new documents haven't generated any discussion on the list.
> Without at least some activity on the list, there's no reason to have
> a meeting - because the list is what defines the WG, not the meeting.
>
> So, unless there are some threads soon, there isn't justification to
> reserve a time slot.  And the agenda closes in about 2 weeks, if I'm
> not mistaken.  I won't mind putting in for a time slot - the sense of
> the list to date is that it isn't worth it.
>
> --
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Edward Lewis                                          +1-703-227-9854
> ARIN Research Engineer
>