To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>
Date:
Wed, 05 Jun 2002 17:49:42 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020513 Netscape/7.0b1
Subject:
Yokohama?
So what's the scoop? Are we anticipating having a meeting in Yokohama? What's the timing on the feedback from the IESG? Is it worth meeting for the recent draft releases? Dan Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >Ed, > >The first draft of EPP-BEEP has been out for some time. A better question >relates to when it might be updated. > >At the Minneapolis meeting Hong mentioned that the original authors of the >containers draft had decided to not pursue it further. Have no editors been >found, or have the original authors changed their minds? > >Has anyone stepped up to write an EPP-over-email I-D? > >I see little reason to meet in the absence of feedback from them IESG on the >documents that have been through WG and IETF last calls, and the lack of >activity on the other drafts. > >-Scott- > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Ed Lewis [mailto:edlewis@arin.net] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:18 PM >>To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se >>Subject: Lack of activity in the group... >> >> >> >>Eyeing the IETF meeting in Yokohama, its about time to decide >>on whether >>we should meet. It would be good to have a meeting there to at least >>bring EPP to the region, but there's no sense "forcing" a meeting. >> >>There's been a lack of activity in the group. We have three >>milestones to meet this month: >> MAY 02 Second draft of Containers >> MAY 02 First draft of EPP over BEEP >> MAY 02 First draft of EPP over SMTP >> >>I'd like to hear WG comments on meeting/not meeting. >> >>