To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>
Date:
Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:12:19 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020212
Subject:
Re: Some More Off-List Comments
Is all this extra information really needed? Registrars should be validating as much information as possible before sending to the registry. This would weed out 95% of problem data. To now add reasons to values makes the registry hold the registrar's hand where the registrar should be smarter than your average registrant. All of this user-friendliness also adds more development burden on the registry. Dan Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Daniel Manley [mailto:dmanley@tucows.com] >>Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:38 PM >>To: Hollenbeck, Scott >>Cc: 'lynettek@netnumber.com'; ietf-provreg@cafax.se >>Subject: Re: Some More Off-List Comments >> >> >>Shouldn't the "reason" tie in with the array of <values>? >>Because each >>field could have a different reason. >> > >Sure, I suppose it could. > >-Scott- >