RE: "registrant" in domain-1.0.xsd

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

I wonder how that slipped through...

Yes, the type in the <info> response should be fixed such that the
registrant element is of type eppcom:clIDType.  Something else to deal with
at the next editing opportunity.

-Scott- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org
> [mailto:asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 6:17 AM
> To: shollenbeck@verisign.com
> Cc: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: "registrant" in domain-1.0.xsd
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> whereas "registrant" is defined as
> 
>       <element name="registrant" type="eppcom:clIDType"
>        minOccurs="0"/>
> 
> in both createType and chgType (for updates), it is defined as
> 
>       <element name="registrant" type="domain:contactType"
>        minOccurs="0"/>
> 
> in infDataType. Even though the "type" part of contactType is 
> not required, 
> wouldn't it for consistency be better to have it as 
> eppcom:clIDType in 
> infDataType as well? This will stop anyone from putting 
> anything in the 
> type-part of the field...
> 
> 
> Asbjorn