To:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:02:33 -0500
In-Reply-To:
<3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD60189B4FD@vsvapostal3.bkup6>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Requirements Document Update
At 11:48 AM -0500 1/4/02, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >More to the point, I think the intention is to ensure that IETF-specified >protocol documents don't build on "problematic" transports. Maybe Ed can >provide more detail based on the exchange he had with Patrik. Sorry, I can't. When I asked about the motivation of the new text, I was told it was to ensure (okay, require) that congestion control was part of the transport. My guess is that this is some concern that blew through the IESG in response to some other networking technology, perhaps telephony related. But I am just guessing. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.