To:
"'Bill Manning'" <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>
Cc:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:48:21 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Requirements Document Update
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Manning [mailto:bmanning@zed.isi.edu] > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 11:51 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: 'ietf-provreg@cafax.se' > Subject: Re: Requirements Document Update > > > So, the protcol is prohibited from running on non-IESG approved > protocols? How the heck are they going to enforce that? Sounds like a job for the protocol police.... ;-) More to the point, I think the intention is to ensure that IETF-specified protocol documents don't build on "problematic" transports. Maybe Ed can provide more detail based on the exchange he had with Patrik. -Scott-