To:
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Cc:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, brunner@bullhead.nic-naa.net
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@zed.isi.edu>
Date:
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 05:15:51 -0800
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<200201061242.g06Cgiu39533@bullhead.nic-naa.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.3.25i
Subject:
Re: Requirements Document Update
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:42:44AM -0800, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote: > bill, > > nice catch. > this is boardering on goofy. Don't get me started. > i think this is the first time i've seen the congestion control on this list. > this means it is way out in left field. Nah, its just that I change hw frequently and the MUA is not always up to par. > if someone finnished doing a transport mapping for smtp, and decided to > write yet-another-mapping, for uucp (hint to self), the users would be as > concerned with the ietf as ... any users of uucp. Ah, but then it would be in violation of the spec! > > (still using uucp) > eric > wampumpeag, llc