RE: <check> in epp-05...

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

That inconsistency appears to be a remnant of the changes made between -04
and -05; it looks like I missed one.  The first statement is what's
intended, so I'll fix the second in this next round of edits.

-Scott- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org
> [mailto:asbjorn.rrp@theglobalname.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 6:52 AM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: <check> in epp-05...
> 
> 
> Hi, 
>  
> in all the mappings, <check> is defined as being "used to 
> determine if an object may be provisioned within a repository". 
>  
> I am not sure if this has been mentioned before, but reading 
> 2.8.2 in the main draft again (epp-05), it states that 
> <check> is used "to determine if an object is known to the server". 
>  
> This is not the same thing, as an object might not exist (not 
> known to the server), but may not be provisioned for other 
> reasons (e.g., defensive registration for .NAME). I think the 
> text in 2.8.2 should be changed to be consistent with the mappings...