[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Daniel Manley <dmanley@tucows.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 10:40:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011012
Subject: auth_info for transfer query command

I just sunk in a couple of days ago that the transfer query command 
doesn't require the object's auth_info.  I'm thinking that it should -- 
or at least the command should be flexible enough to validate the 
auth_info if it is provided.

I know that the truth is told in the transfer request command, but 
practically speaking, I think many registrars (of which OpenSRS is one) 
will want to validate the auth_info with the registry before really 
issuing the transfer request.  This is mostly due to ICANN requirements 
(?) of transfers being asynchronous events:  for example, registrant 
requests with the registrar, registrant is asked for confirmation via 
email with use of whois, registrar screens/reviews periodic transfers 
for anything out of the ordinary.  It would be a shame to go through all 
the motions just to find out at the end that the auth_info was bogus.

What does everyone think -- especially registrars using EPP now?

Also without the auth_info being required for transfer query, this 
allows registrars not involved in the transfer to "spy" on others' 
activities.  Is this ok?

Dan


Home | Date list | Subject list