To:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
lewis@tislabs.com, jaap@sidn.nl
From:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Date:
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 14:00:31 -0500
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
pre-agenda for SLC
A month from now we will have the Salt Lake City meetings. We'll have one multicasted hour. Here is what I hope to cover (as a first cut): 1) Status (document traffic) 2) What do we need before sending EPP(*) to the IESG? a) Implementation reports b) Identification/not-discussion of issues 3) Perhaps an issue discussion 4) Other document progress I've been debating discussing "Future Directions" but I think that it would be premature, so I want to refrain from that at SLC. (IOW - don't suggest it!) Oh, the '*': the set of documents that seems to be prudent to progess are in two groups: #2-5 and #6, referring to this numbering. I want to start to progress all 5, but I am shying away from formally tying the TCP transport to the core documents - just for "show." I don't want to detract from the effort to develop #7. >1) The requirements >2) EPP base >3) EPP domain mapping >4) EPP host mapping >5) EPP contact mapping >6) EPP over TCP >7) EPP over BEEP >8) Containers in EPP >9) Definitions Some of the issues behind progressing the documents. First, the IESG still hasn't commented on the updated requirements. Second, we will have a WG last call when appropriate. Third, I want to get some implementation reports to give more creedence to the completeness of the drafts. Note - documents can progress to some levels of standards without implementations, so the third point is not a necessary condition. Also, the appropriate time to go to last call may be before SLC, during, or after. BTW - Jaap and I will be at the Marina del Ray ICANN meeting next week. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NAI Labs Phone: +1 443-259-2352 Email: lewis@tislabs.com You fly too often when ... the airport taxi is on speed-dial. Opinions expressed are property of my evil twin, not my employer.