To:
"'Edward Lewis'" <lewis@tislabs.com>, ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Cc:
jaap@sidn.nl
From:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Date:
Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:21:35 -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: preparing for Salt Lake City (part 1)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lewis [mailto:lewis@tislabs.com] > Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 10:12 AM > To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se > Cc: lewis@tislabs.com; jaap@sidn.nl > Subject: RE: preparing for Salt Lake City (part 1) > > > Even with this issue (which should be presented on the list first anyway), > and a WG status report, I can't think of more than an hour's worth of > material. I think it is time to get some implementation feedback being > that we've moved into the phase of registries adopting EPP. It might be > reasonable to have some discussion on the container draft as it is the > least mature. > > 1) Will we want to discuss the opt-in schema? I'd suggest adding it as an agenda item iff a proposal is presented to the list (with sufficient time for review) first. If no proposal is forthcoming, we should move on. > 2) Are there implementors that are willing to present commentary on the > specifications? Yes. -Scott-