To:
Edward Lewis <lewis@tislabs.com>
Cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Patrick <patrick@gandi.net>
Date:
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:15:59 +0200
Content-Disposition:
inline
In-Reply-To:
<v03130306b7aad5dc6550@[199.171.39.21]>; from lewis@tislabs.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:56:29AM -0400
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
User-Agent:
Mutt/1.2.5i
Subject:
Re: Push vs. not Push
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 11:56:29AM -0400, Edward Lewis took time to write: > After going through the email and minutes, I think that there is a need to > poll the list to see if folks want the "push" mechanism to be defined or > not. As a Registrar of gTLDs, we prefer that the PUSH mechanism is not a MUST. It _may_ be defined in the protocol, but only the POLL mechanism should be a MUST. Patrick.