[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Bason, Chris" <cbason@verisign.com>
cc: "'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>, brunner@nic-naa.net
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 23:50:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:02:22 EDT." <3CD14E451751BD42BA48AAA50B07BAD6AE9C17@vsvapostal3.prod.netsol.com>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Message Pushing and TCP Transport

> Would someone please elaborate on why this push concept 
> is advantageous to EPP (preferably a PUSH proponent)? 

The issue has been discussed quite a few times on the list, not just at -50
and -51. See the general discussion of transfer notification.

Eric

Home | Date list | Subject list