To:
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
CC:
"'ietf-provreg@cafax.se'" <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>
Date:
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:16:07 +0200
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Poll response data
"Hollenbeck, Scott" wrote: > > Dan, > > Echoing what Rick said, I believe that the types of informational messages > that should be made available via a <poll> are a matter of registry policy, > so that's why there isn't a detailed description of the messages that may be > supported. I also believe that some situations should be relayed to a > client via messages that can be polled, and others should be relayed to a > client via offline reporting. Those situations that require timely client > protocol action, such as any object transfer or upcoming object expiration, > should be relayed to the client via the polling mechanism. Purely > informational notices that don't have temporal factors may be better left to > some kind of registry reporting service. > > I'm sure I can make the text more clear to make this intent more obvious. > > <Scott/> Hi Scott, sorry, I have to disagree. Since the transfer of objects is an integral part of your protocol, it is a kind of incompleteness if the mechanisms which are used to notify the losing registrar are not described. You describe in detail when the gaining or losing registrar may request/cancel/reject/approve a transfer, but not the exact way of the notification, although this is similar essential to the transfer process as the other stuff. Since you already limited the freedom of a registry's policy* (e.g. the object model/fields, the relation between hosts and domains, the way that objects are transferred), I don't see any problems in defining a message returned on a poll that contains at least the following information: the object which is requested to be transferred, the registrar who wants to gain the object, an expire date that tells the losing registrar if/when a default action is taken and what this default action is (approval or rejection). * this is, of course, not an accusation. Anyone who defines a protocol has to fix things and thus limiting the degree of freedom. regards, Klaus Malorny ___________________________________________________________________________ | | | knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH ------- Technologiepark Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny 44227 Dortmund Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de Tel. +49 231 9703 0