[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
cc: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, "'Damaraju, Ayesha'" <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200105162256.f4GMuJc07639@nic-naa.net>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Epp - Contacts


eric,

could you provide a use case for the utility of many addresses. If
registrars use these addresses for verification shich one should be chosen
so send corispondance if they all have an equal weight.

thanks,

-rick

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine wrote:

> Will, that's an improvement over insisting on a rational for any number
> other than one. Lacking a counter (and I'm in no unseemly haste) we're
> just dickering over which small int to elect.
>
> Eric
>


Home | Date list | Subject list