To: "'George Belotsky'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:05:16 -0400
Subject: RE: Question about draft-hollenbeck-epp-tcp-01.txt
The subject document isn't yet a provreg WG work item. The discussion list for the document is the NSI RRP mailing list until the WG decides to pick it up. Since you asked the question here, though... RECOMMENDED is strong enough language to make the appropriate point, so I won't argue against removing OPTIONAL. <Scott/> > -----Original Message----- > From: George Belotsky [mailto:email@example.com] > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 4:09 PM > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Question about draft-hollenbeck-epp-tcp-01.txt > > > On page 4 of "draft-hollenbeck-epp-tcp-01.txt", it says > > "An EPP command MUST be a well-formed XML instance. An EPP command > begins with an OPTIONAL (but RECOMMENDED) XML processing instruction, > followed by an <epp> element..." > > Should we drop 'OPTIONAL' (and just keep 'RECOMMENDED')? The two > mean different things according to RFC 2119.