To:
Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
Cc:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date:
Sat, 07 Apr 2001 10:22:46 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSF.4.33.0104070935590.60020-100000@rockstar.stealthgeeks.net>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Privacy state/context
Patrick, I'm not entirely following your query. Could you elaborate? (Pure hypotheticals are fine. We can distinguish between your general query and your giving a detailed hypothetical that is only for pedagogy, not intended as a real proposal.) I would just like to better understand what kind of thing you have in mind. Thanks. d/ At 09:47 AM 4/7/2001, Patrick Greenwell wrote: >I do have a question/comment: would the concept of state be appropriate >with social information as it is with certain other objects, say in the >case where privacy of information is desired and a higher-layered protocol >would take that state information(privacy lock or somesuch) into account? ---------- Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com> Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com> tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464