To:
<ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
Date:
Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
<v03130307b6f029502884@[64.214.53.125]>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Provreg WG Last Call announcement
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Edward Lewis wrote:
> So, in the effort to promote the requirements draft to an RFC, let the last
> call begin.
First, let me say thanks to all of you who have been labouring on this
draft. It's elegant in it's simplicity.
I do have a question/comment: would the concept of state be appropriate
with social information as it is with certain other objects, say in the
case where privacy of information is desired and a higher-layered protocol
would take that state information(privacy lock or somesuch) into account?
Thanks.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell
Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/