To:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>, "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Cc:
"Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "Peter Chow" <peter@interq.or.jp>, "Zhu Yu" <yu.zhu@i-dns.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
"James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Date:
Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:40:39 +0800
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Design teams
The answer would depends on the protocol. -James Seng > At 16.00 -0600 01-03-21, Brian W. Spolarich wrote: > > Do folks really think the TCP overhead is that big of a problem? > > Or rather, because issues like congestion control, packet ordering > and reordering, fragmentation of blocks of data, error correction etc > have to be handled by all protocols -- what makes people belive that > this transport mechanism will be "cheaper" than TCP, SCTP or whatever > else (even cheaper than BEEP over TCP or SCTP)? > > paf >