[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>, "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>, Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Cc: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "Peter Chow" <peter@interq.or.jp>, "Zhu Yu" <yu.zhu@i-dns.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 06:40:39 +0800
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: Re: Design teams

The answer would depends on the protocol.

-James Seng

> At 16.00 -0600 01-03-21, Brian W. Spolarich wrote:
> >   Do folks really think the TCP overhead is that big of a  problem?
>
> Or rather, because issues like congestion control, packet ordering
> and reordering, fragmentation of blocks of data, error correction etc
> have to be handled by all protocols -- what makes people belive that
> this transport mechanism will be "cheaper" than TCP, SCTP or whatever
> else (even cheaper than BEEP over TCP or SCTP)?
>
>     paf
>


Home | Date list | Subject list