To:
"Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>, "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>
Cc:
"Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "Peter Chow" <peter@interq.or.jp>, "Zhu Yu" <yu.zhu@i-dns.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date:
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:19:21 -0600
In-Reply-To:
<IPEMICCPDPPICMIONJIOGEGECEAA.briansp@walid.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
RE: Design teams
At 16.00 -0600 01-03-21, Brian W. Spolarich wrote:
> Do folks really think the TCP overhead is that big of a problem?
Or rather, because issues like congestion control, packet ordering
and reordering, fragmentation of blocks of data, error correction etc
have to be handled by all protocols -- what makes people belive that
this transport mechanism will be "cheaper" than TCP, SCTP or whatever
else (even cheaper than BEEP over TCP or SCTP)?
paf