[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


To: "Jordyn A. Buchanan" <jordyn@register.com>, "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "George Michaelson" <ggm@apnic.net>
Cc: "Bill Manning" <bmanning@isi.edu>, "Peter Chow" <peter@interq.or.jp>, "Zhu Yu" <yu.zhu@i-dns.net>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From: "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:00:23 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <a05010405b6decf7b4ac8@[135.222.68.76]>
Sender: owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject: RE: Design teams


| Is there an example of a UDP-based transport protocol that might 
| be applicable?

  Rx, which was part of the CMU AFS work, was a UDP-based RPC
protocol with some of the characteristics that are required
here.

  Do folks really think the TCP overhead is that big of a 
problem?  Memory and CPU is much cheaper these days, and I haven't
seen a requirement stated that would necessitate going down
the UDP road.

  -bws

Home | Date list | Subject list