To:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
cc:
Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>, "Brian W. Spolarich" <briansp@walid.com>, George Belotsky <george@register.com>, Hollenbeck Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, <ietf-provreg@cafax.se>
From:
Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:15:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<200103090007.f29077r03071@zed.isi.edu>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
> How are Registry Identifiers different from the handles > we have been tossing about? I expect that handle concatination > between objects may be useful to narrow scope in -limited- > circumstances, the general rule should be to only expose the > handle. None of <MY> handles is going to have, as part of > <MY> handle, a conncationation that describes some association. > Their handles might... :) Bill, the utility come from the ability to locate the object through a yet to be detemined protocol. -rick