To:
paf@cisco.com (Patrik Fältström)
Cc:
bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning), briansp@walid.com (Brian W. Spolarich), george@register.com (George Belotsky), shollenbeck@verisign.com (Hollenbeck Scott), ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Bill Manning <bmanning@isi.edu>
Date:
Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:16:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
<p05100130b6cd8c0e2f6c@[192.168.1.24]> from "Patrik Fältström" at Mar 08, 2001 08:32:05 PM
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Unique handle generation
% % At 11.00 -0800 01-03-08, Bill Manning wrote: % > How will "handles" support non-ASCII character representations? % % Rathole! Tah. Told you it was a curve ball... :) % > Endgame... I think I should be able to select the "seed" be which % > my Internet-wide, unique handle is created. My seed is used to % > generate a unique handle that has at least two other, non-Internet % > related "salts". So my handle might be: % > % > WM-9387-19790922:09:27:33 % % Ok, that solves the uniqueness. % % A related question: % % Let's say that this record is stored in whois server at the RIR "A" % when you get your first IP-addresses. Now, you go to registrar "B" of % TLD-registry "C" and register a domain, should you not be able to % have your handle at "A" as pointer to the technical contact for your % domain? I rather see that than having one person object for you at A, % and one at C (or even, one at A, one at B and one at D which might be % a different registry -- paralell with B -- of C). % % paf Again, going to the corporation analogy, I get an employee number. As I am assigned to various operating groups and divisions, the "composite" identifer is built as the group+eid, e.g. my eid is #9387 and I am assigned to two operating groups, div7 and group33. Inside the group, I am 33-9387 and in the division, I am 7-9387. All it really takes to find me is the eid. So, the record stored in RIR'A' will be the composite of my eid and the RIRid. When I go to 'B' or 'C', I would -NOT- use the composite built from 'A', I'd use the "core" eid. -- --bill