Re: Interim meeting minutes

[Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

I have a few comments about the minutes taken, they are inline.

-rick

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Edward Lewis wrote:


> Handle Issues
> 	- ability to reference objects in other registries
> 	  specifically: Contacts
> 	- move to a more general approach
> 	- a global namespace for object storage for each registry
> 	- privacy issues were brought up.
> 	- Decided that there is no reason NOT to use it (But shouldn't be in
>           this protocol - only the ability to do it should be in the protocol)
> 	- Still an open issue

I don't think we decided anything, as an interm meeting can't decide. I
believe we recomended that Global Unique handles would be a Good Thing(tm)
for the protocol to support.

>
> Transport Issues (BEEP, parsing at client)
>   - statement made that transport alternatives are needed to improve
> 	  efficiency

we discussed ways that the current proposals could shorten the amount of
data transfered by establishing context oriented data in the session
establishment phase of protocol negoation.

> Design Teams

> 	- Design teams work all through March
> 	- Deadline - end of week (Feb 23) for design team formation (5-7
> people)
[snip]

I hope the chairs will announce these soon, with well defined objectives.


> Discussion of consummating the collution effort
> 	- Having a "commercial Implmentors consortium
> 	- Interoperability testing
> 	- Load testing
> 	- Rich Shockey volunteered to start Implementors group
> 		* Email to rich.shockey@neustar.com to join mailing list

The list is at pri@ar.com, PRI stands from ProvReg Implementors. alot of
folks have already subscribed. To subscribe send a message with the word
"Subscribe" (without the quotes) to pri-request@ar.com

-rick