To:
Ayesha Damaraju <ayesha.damaraju@neustar.com>
cc:
ietf-provreg@cafax.se
From:
Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@sidn.nl>
Date:
Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:32:44 +0100
In-reply-to:
Your message of Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:59:59 -0600. <BAD8B0FBF5EED411B21F001083FCEF8F130675@dc02.npac.com>
Sender:
owner-ietf-provreg@cafax.se
Subject:
Re: Transfer Notification a requirement?
3.7 Object Transfer
[6] The protocol MUST provide services that allow the original
sponsoring registrar to approve or reject a requested object transfer.
...............
...........
[8] Object Transfer requests MUST NOT be acted upon without giving the
losing registrar an opportunity to respond to the request...
Unless [8] implies that a notification needs to be sent to the losing
registrar to approve or reject giving them an opportunity - In which case i
t
needs to be clear, even otherwise notifying the sponsoring registrar to
approve or reject the transfer should be a requirement.
Note that the protocol MUST provide this service. However, it is
a policy decision whether the registry actually implements this.
As said before, the Dutch domain registry doesn't allow this. The
old (or ``loosing registar'') has some time to comment on the
transfer, but when there is no adequate reason to halt the transfer,
it will happen anyway. This to prevent a registrar taking a domain
hostage, because there is a conflict between registrar and registrant.
Something that happened a lot when we allowed the old regsitrar to
veto any transfer.
jaap