RE: Transfer Notification a requirement?

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>]

Requirement 3.7-[7] was intended to address registrar/client awareness of
transfers:

[7] The protocol MUST provide services that allow both the original
sponsoring registrar and the potential new registrar to monitor the status
of both pending and completed transfer requests.

I didn't want to get more specific about how the monitoring or notification
facilities should look.

<Scott/>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ayesha Damaraju [mailto:ayesha.damaraju@neustar.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 1:00 PM
> To: ietf-provreg@cafax.se
> Subject: Transfer Notification a requirement?
> 
> 
> 
> Considering below two requirements from GRRP_reqs_06
> 
> 3.7 Object Transfer
> 
> [6] The protocol MUST provide services that allow the original 
> sponsoring registrar to approve or reject a requested object transfer.
> ...............
> ...........
> 
> [8] Object Transfer requests MUST NOT be acted upon without giving the
> losing registrar an opportunity to respond to the request...
> 
> 
> Unless [8] implies that a notification needs to be sent to the losing
> registrar to approve or reject giving them an opportunity - 
> In which case it
> 
> needs to be clear, even otherwise notifying the sponsoring 
> registrar to 
> approve or reject the transfer should be a requirement.
> 
> -Ayesha
>  
>